Apty competitors aren’t hard to find. But identifying the right one for your use case is where most teams waste weeks.
If you’re an IT manager ensuring employees complete mandatory training on Salesforce or Oracle, Apty is a functional choice. However, if you’re a SaaS product manager trying to drive adoption within your own application, you may want to take a look at Apty competitors.
In this guide, I categorized the top Apty competitors by the job to be done. I distinguish between internal training tools and SaaS growth engines, so you can stop getting demos of software that was never built for your use case.
Try Userpilot Now
See Why 1,000+ Teams Choose Userpilot
What is Apty?
Apty positions itself as a Digital Adoption Platform (DAP). This category covers everything from internal employee enablement to customer-facing user onboarding.
In practice, most DAPs lean strongly toward one side or the other. For Apty, its main strength is driving internal adoption. The platform helps employees follow the correct steps within complex systems, reduce costly mistakes, and support training programs.

Apty’s key features
Apty’s feature set is built around in-app guidance, workflow support, and adoption visibility for enterprise environments.
- Software walkthroughs: The platform lets users set up step-by-step guidance (consisting of tooltips, task lists, and contextual nudges) inside applications.
- Knowledge base: It provides an in-context help layer that lets users access support content without leaving their workflow.
- Data monitoring: Apty tracks interaction and completion data to help teams see how guidance performs and where users drop off.
- Apty PULSE: This is Apty’s analytics and insights layer, designed to highlight adoption gaps and surface areas where users struggle.
- Apty OneX: Like Pulse, this is more of a packaging layer than a standalone feature. It offers an AI-powered, all-in-one experience by bringing Apty’s guidance, support, and analytics into a single interface.
💡Note: As you might have noticed from the features above, Apty is not designed for self-serve customer onboarding. The platform comes with a heavier technical overhead than most SaaS teams want. It also offers fewer engagement patterns for discovery and activation, and lacks built-in product analytics. That said, it’s a strong fit for internal adoption in complex enterprise environments.
Apty pricing
Unlike most enterprise-grade DAPs, Apty is transparent about its starting price.
The platform starts at $9,500 per app, per year, and that base package provides access to all its core capabilities. However, the final cost can vary depending on the scope and complexity of your needs.

Apty’s pros
Apty users consistently highlight three strengths:
- Ease of use: Most teams find it straightforward to build and maintain guidance content without constant engineering support. However, initial setup can feel complex depending on your environment and rollout scope.
- Enterprise readiness: Apty is designed for large-scale deployments where process compliance, cross-team consistency, and administrative control matter.
- Customer support: Users frequently call out Apty’s responsiveness and hands-on support, especially during implementation and ongoing optimization.
Apty’s cons
Apty’s main drawbacks show up when teams expect a modern, product-led onboarding experience rather than an enterprise adoption tool:
- Limited user onboarding features: As mentioned, the platform’s engagement elements are more focused on step-by-step compliance guidance than on interactive onboarding experiences. This makes it less suitable for SaaS activation and feature discovery.
- Lack of robust product analytics: While Apty offers adoption monitoring, it doesn’t provide the kind of built-in product analytics SaaS teams rely on for funnels, retention insights, and behavior-based targeting without external integrations.
- Steep and opaque pricing: Even with a published starting price, final costs can scale quickly depending on rollout needs. Pricing details still require a sales conversation for most realistic implementations.
- Implementation hiccups: Some teams report that setup takes longer than expected, especially in complex environments where integrations, permissions, and enterprise IT requirements add friction.
- Clunky interface: Compared to newer onboarding tools, Apty’s interface can feel dated and less intuitive, particularly when you’re building and managing guidance content at scale.
Top 8 Apty competitors
On software review platforms, Apty is often compared with a wide mix of onboarding tools, even though many of them are built for very different use cases.
To make your decision easier, I’ll review the top Apty competitors in three categories: employee-focused adoption platforms, user onboarding tools for SaaS, and all-in-one platforms that combine onboarding with product analytics.
1. Userpilot: The best for SaaS product growth
Userpilot is an all-in-one product growth platform that helps SaaS teams drive adoption with in-app onboarding, user feedback, and product analytics.

Userpilot’s key features
Here are some of Userpilot’s features for driving product-led growth:
- SaaS-ready onboarding: Userpilot provides UI patterns like flows, spotlights, and banners to help you build contextual onboarding experiences without writing a line of code. You can also tag features to track usage and trigger the right onboarding content at the right moment.

- Personalized walkthroughs: You can trigger flows based on custom events, user properties, or even in-app behaviors. For example, if a user clicks “Sign Up” but doesn’t finish the process, you can have a flow that automatically launches to guide them through the remaining steps, address common points of confusion, and help them complete the signup without contacting support.

- Deep analytics: Userpilot doesn’t just show you completion rates. It includes product analytics such as trends, funnels, and paths. You can see where users drop off and connect those insights directly to feature usage and activation outcomes.

- Feedback loops: Userpilot lets you collect feedback in-app using NPS surveys and targeted microsurveys, without writing code or sending users to external forms. You can start fast with ready-made templates or build surveys from scratch, then save your best-performing formats as reusable templates. To help you make sense of responses quickly, Userpilot also includes AI-powered survey analytics. You can surface key themes and insights, and act on feedback instead of spending hours sorting through it.

Userpilot considerations
- Focused on user onboarding, not employee training: Userpilot excels at customer-facing onboarding and product growth, but it doesn’t support internal enterprise training use cases the way traditional DAPs do.
Userpilot pricing
Userpilot offers three pricing tiers:
- Starter: This plan costs $299/month, billed annually. It supports up to 2,000 MAUs and includes core onboarding and engagement features such as in-app experiences, user segmentation and tracking, usage trend analysis, and NPS surveys.
- Growth: Starting from 5,000 MAUs, Growth is built for teams scaling user adoption. It provides advanced capabilities such as deeper product analytics, event auto-capture, a resource center with advanced in-app surveys, and email engagement, plus add-ons for session replays and mobile engagement.
- Enterprise: Enterprise is designed for larger organizations that need premium integrations, bulk data export and import, data warehouse sync, security and compliance support, and other enterprise-grade features.

Userpilot vs Apty
Userpilot is the better choice if your main priorities are revenue, user retention, and product-led growth. Choose Apty if your priority is internal adoption and structured employee guidance.
2. WalkMe: The heavyweight enterprise software
WalkMe is a digital adoption platform used to guide people through websites and business software while they work. It’s one of the best-known options in the enterprise market.

WalkMe’s Key features
- Walkthroughs and SmartTips: The platform provides in-app guidance that adapts to the user’s context, helping them complete complex internal workflows with step-by-step prompts, tooltips, and on-screen nudges.
- AI-powered insights and optimization recommendations: WalkMe surfaces adoption patterns and friction points to help teams identify where users get stuck and prioritize fixes based on real usage signals.
- Enterprise-grade admin controls and security: WalkMe includes governance features that support large rollouts, with the controls and security capabilities needed for IT teams managing adoption across regulated environments.
WalkMe considerations
- Steep learning curve for builders: Creating advanced experiences and maintaining them over time can take practice. Many teams find the platform more complex than expected once they go beyond basic walkthroughs.
- Heavy reliance on specialized ownership: WalkMe often requires dedicated admins or certified builders to manage content and workflows effectively. This can slow iteration and make smaller teams reliant on a few power users.
- Editor and collaboration limitations: Many users mention workflow and editor gaps. Version control and content management features would make multi-admin maintenance easier at scale.
WalkMe pricing
The platform doesn’t disclose its pricing, so you’ll need to book a demo to get a quote tailored to your organization’s size, use case, and rollout scope.
For a rough benchmark, third-party data from Vendr suggests the median buyer pays around $44,000 per year. However, the user license fees can reach six figures for large enterprises with complex implementations and security requirements.

WalkMe vs Apty
WalkMe and Apty are closely matched, enterprise-focused platforms. The decision here usually isn’t about missing capabilities, but scale, control, and how heavy your rollout needs to be.
Choose WalkMe if you’re operating at a very large scale, need extensive workflow automation, or are rolling out software applications like Oracle or SAP to tens of thousands of employees under strict governance requirements.
Go for Apty if you want a more contained approach to internal guidance and adoption monitoring, without the same level of automation depth or implementation complexity.
3. WhatFix: Catch-all DAP for enterprises
WhatFix is an enterprise DAP designed to support internal software adoption across a wide range of use cases, from employee training and process guidance to onboarding and change management initiatives.

WhatFix’s key features
- AI-powered contextual guidance: WhatFix adapts in-app guidance in real time based on user context and behavior, making prompts more relevant without requiring heavy manual configuration.
- Self-help and searchable support: The platform includes a configurable self-help widget that lets users access documentation and training materials in-app. This reduces the extra friction that comes with having to visit an external support portal.
- Simulation and training environments: With tools like WhatFix Mirror, teams can create interactive sandbox environments for hands-on practice and role-based training without impacting live production systems.
Whatfix considerations
- Setup and implementation support needed: Though Whatfix offers strong customer support, initial implementation and achieving full value often benefit from dedicated support or professional services, which adds to rollout time and cost.
- Customization limitations in certain areas: Some teams report restrictions on workflow customization, analytics details, and translation features, which can feel limiting compared with similar tools.
- Interface complexity: Many users find parts of the UI and analytics dashboards confusing or less intuitive.
WhatFix pricing
WhatFix offers three plans, but all of them are custom-priced based on factors such as the size of your user base, the specific WhatFix capabilities you need, and the platforms you plan to support.
For a rough benchmark, data from Vendr indicates a median contract value of $31,950 per year, though actual pricing can vary.

Whatfix vs Apty
WhatFix and Apty target very similar use cases.
The main difference is breadth. WhatFix offers a wider range of engagement elements and training formats, which can make it a better fit if you need more flexibility in how you deliver guidance, self-help, and simulations across applications.
4. Pendo: Analytics-first product experience platform
Pendo is a product experience platform built around deep analytics, with a strong focus on understanding user behavior and driving product growth.

Pendo’s key features
- Analytics: Pendo’s core strength lies in its analytics. The platform offers detailed tracking of user interactions, feature usage, funnels, and paths.
- Guides: Pendo provides tooltips, banners, and walkthroughs for creating contextual guidance that helps users discover features and understand key workflows.
- Pendo listen: This is Pendo’s feedback and research layer, which allows teams to collect insights through in-app polls and surveys.
Pendo considerations
- Onboarding features feel secondary: Because the platform prioritizes analytics, its onboarding tools (“Guides”) can feel less refined. The builder is less intuitive than platforms like Userpilot, and customizing style or layout often requires CSS edits.
- Premium features behind high tiers: Many of Pendo’s more advanced capabilities, including deeper segmentation and automation triggers, are locked behind higher-priced plans. You may need to upgrade your contract before you can act on the insights you collect.
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical teams: Pendo’s depth of data and configuration options means that teams without dedicated analytics expertise may struggle to set up and interpret reports, which can slow down insights and decision-making.
Pendo pricing
Pendo offers a free plan capped at 500 MAUs, along with three paid plans that require booking a demo to access pricing details.
Based on data from 519 purchases tracked by Vendr, the median buyer pays $48,500 per year. Still, the pricing can climb into six-figure contracts for teams that need advanced capabilities and broader access across the platform.

Pendo vs Apty
Choose Pendo if your priority is deep product analytics, usage insights, and roadmap planning, and you’re comfortable with higher pricing to access those capabilities.
Apty is the better fit if your focus is on employee onboarding rather than understanding customer behavior inside a SaaS product.
5. Appcues: Design-centric in-app guidance
Appcues popularized no-code in-app flows, with a strong emphasis on design and ease of use. Its biggest strength lies in polished templates, making it a solid choice for teams that prioritize aesthetics in their onboarding experiences.

Appcues’ key features
- No-code flow builder with rich UI patterns: The platform offers a drag-and-drop builder that makes it easy to assemble onboarding flows, modals, tooltips, and banners without engineering support.
- Segmented targeting and personalization: Appcues lets you show the right content to the right users by targeting flows based on user attributes, behavior, or account data.
- Multi-step and branching experiences: The platform allows you to build multi-step flows with logic that responds to user actions.
Appcues considerations
- Basic analytics: Appcues struggles with deep analytics compared to platforms like Userpilot. While they’ve improved their reporting, they still rely heavily on integrations with tools like Mixpanel or Amplitude for detailed data analysis, which means you don’t get full insights inside the tool itself.
- Narrow feedback capabilities: The platform offers limited options for collecting user feedback, with surveys largely restricted to NPS. This reduces flexibility compared to platforms with more robust feedback tooling.
- Pricey relative to scope: Appcues can feel expensive for a tool focused primarily on in-app engagement and guidance. For teams that need analytics, feedback, and experimentation in the same platform, the cost can be harder to justify.
Appcues pricing
Appcues offers two pricing plans:
- Grow: This plan starts at $750 per month for 1000 MAUs on one app. It’s intended for growing teams that want access to Appcues’ core in-app experiences, segmentation, integrations, and onboarding support.
- Enterprise: This is a custom-priced plan for larger organizations with more complex needs, including higher limits on published experiences, multi-product setups, advanced security and compliance requirements, and priority support with a dedicated success team.

Appcues vs Apty
Appcues is a good fit when visuals and fast setup matter more than behavior-driven targeting or deep analytics. Go for it if your team simply needs a tool for building polished in-app experiences without heavy technical setup.
6. UserGuiding: Budget-friendly user onboarding
UserGuiding is built around simplicity, allowing teams to launch basic product tours in minutes. It’s often a practical entry point for early-stage startups that want to improve their onboarding process quickly.

UserGuiding’s key features
- No-code product tours: The platform provides a visual editor for building in-app experiences with UI patterns like tooltips, modals, and hotspots to guide users through key workflows step by step.
- Simple segmentation: You can target onboarding content based on basic user attributes like role, plan, or signup date, which allows for light personalization without introducing complex rules or setup.
- Resource center: UserGuiding lets you build a simple in-app resource center where users can access help content and onboarding materials on demand.
UserGuiding considerations
- Limited analytics and segmentation depth: UserGuiding’s analytics are fairly basic, and its segmentation options don’t support more advanced use cases. It starts to feel restrictive when you need to work with complex customer segments, use behavioral targeting, or track nuanced lifecycle events.
- Hard to scale personalization: While the tool is easy to get started with, it struggles to deliver truly personalized experiences. Products with multiple user roles, complex permissions, or flows triggered by custom events will quickly outgrow its capabilities.
- Dependence on external analytics tools: Like Appcues, UserGuiding relies on integrations with dedicated product analytics platforms to analyze nuanced user behavior. This adds extra setup and fragments insights across tools.
UserGuiding pricing
UserGuiding offers four pricing plans:
- Free: This plan covers basic self-service support needs, letting you create an in-app resource center, share product updates, and provide lightweight customer assistance.
- Starter: Priced at $174 per month, this plan includes UserGuiding’s core adoption features, basic reporting and segmentation, customizable in-app surveys, and access to all onboarding elements.
- Growth: Starting at $349 per month, Growth adds A/B testing, goal tracking, custom CSS, localization, and premium integrations, making it better suited for teams scaling onboarding efforts.
- Enterprise: Custom-priced for larger organizations, this plan includes advanced security and compliance features, SAML SSO, activity logs, and personalized onboarding and support.

UserGuiding vs Apty
Go for UserGuiding if you’re working with a limited budget and only need basic user engagement elements rather than a full enterprise adoption platform.
7. Userlane: Software adoption insights tool
Userlane is a digital adoption platform focused on helping organizations guide users through software workflows while capturing adoption insights along the way.

Userlane’s key features
- Interactive walkthroughs: Userlane offers step-by-step guidance that appears directly inside applications.
- Role-based guidance targeting: The platform’s segmentation features let you show guidance based on user roles or permissions. This means different user segments will see content tailored to their responsibilities and needs.
- Process analytics: Userlane provides engagement insights to help teams identify where users struggle and which processes may need improvement or further support.
Userlane considerations
- Time-consuming for complex walkthroughs: Ongoing updates become more demanding when the underlying software changes frequently.
- Mobile and multi-platform friction: Userlane is strongest on web-based experiences, but creating and maintaining guidance for mobile or multi-platform environments is less seamless.
- Limited advanced customization: Userlane supports core guidance patterns, but the customization options often fall short when you need highly branded experiences, richer formatting, or more polished UI control.
Userlane’s pricing
Userlane uses a custom, quote-based pricing model, so you’ll need to speak with sales to get an exact figure for your rollout.
For a ballpark estimate, third-party data from Vendr suggests Userlane typically falls between $17,000 and $25,000 per year, with an average annual contract value of roughly $18,000, depending on your implementation scope and requirements.

Userlane vs Apty
Userlane is a similar option to other employee-centered DAPs.
It’s often a better fit for SMBs that want internal guidance and adoption insights without committing to the heavier setup and cost structure of larger enterprise platforms.
8. Intercom: Customer support platform with onboarding elements
Intercom is primarily a customer support and messaging platform, but it also includes onboarding and in-app engagement features that SaaS teams can use to guide users, highlight key actions, and support activation.
Many teams also use it as a customer success platform for managing conversations and support workflows across the customer lifecycle.

Intercom’s key features
- In-app messaging and chat: Intercom lets you support users in real time through live chat, automated replies, and targeted messages inside your product, helping remove friction during onboarding.
- Product tours: Intercom includes product tours that help you guide users through key workflows with step-by-step in-app experiences.
- Automation and routing: The platform provides automation tools that help you scale support, route conversations to the right team, and reduce manual workload while maintaining responsiveness.
Intercom considerations
- Onboarding depth is limited: Intercom’s tours and in-app experiences work for basic guidance. However, they don’t offer the same depth of onboarding patterns, targeting logic, and iteration workflows as dedicated adoption tools.
- Pricing scales quickly: Intercom’s pricing model can get expensive fast, especially once you add seats, higher usage, or multiple add-ons, which makes it harder to justify if onboarding is your main use case.
- Not analytics-first: Intercom offers reporting for messaging and support performance, but it’s not designed for deep product analytics like funnels, paths, and feature adoption insights. Teams often need separate tooling to measure onboarding impact.
Intercom pricing
Intercom offers three main pricing plans:
- Essential: Starts at $29 per seat/month and includes core support features like the Messenger, shared inbox, ticketing, reporting, and a public help center.
- Advanced: Starts at $85 per seat/month and adds stronger automation and collaboration features, such as workflow automation, routing, and multiple team inboxes.
- Expert: Starts at $132 per seat/month and is built for larger teams, with enterprise-grade capabilities like SSO, identity management, SLAs, and stronger security controls.
In addition to the base plans, Intercom charges extra for add-ons. They sell onboarding elements under a separate add-on that starts at $99/month. If you also want to use Fin AI Agent to automate customer support conversations, it costs $0.99 per resolution. All of these can quickly push the total cost up.

Intercom vs Apty
Choose Intercom if you want a customer support-first platform, and onboarding is only a secondary use case. If onboarding is your main priority, Intercom is hard to justify on cost, and most SaaS companies hit the ceiling quickly with its onboarding capabilities.
Criteria for choosing the right Apty alternative
When you evaluate the DAPs, don’t just look at the feature list on their pricing page. Focus on how well each platform fits your workflow, technical environment, and the type of adoption you’re actually trying to drive.
1. Implementation speed
How long does it take from signing a contract to going live? With Apty or WalkMe, it can take months.
With a more self-serve tool like Userpilot, you can typically go live in days by installing the SDK, identifying users through JavaScript or Segment, and building onboarding flows directly in the no-code builder.
2. Content flexibility
Can you build different types of in-app content? You need more than basic tooltips and tours. For effective onboarding, look for a tool that offers:
- Checklists: To guide users through a sequence of actions.
- Resource centers: To provide on-demand help inside the product.
- Spotlights and hotspots: To draw attention to new features without interrupting the experience.
- Slideouts: To share contextual guidance, announcements, or next steps without taking over the full screen.
3. Data integration
Your DAP shouldn’t become a data silo. Choose a tool that makes it easy to send data to your analytics stack and pull data in from your CRM.
Platforms like Userpilot support native integrations with Mixpanel, Amplitude, Heap, and Google Analytics out of the box, making it easy to connect onboarding performance to real product usage without stitching everything together manually.
4. Support for mobile
Does your product have a mobile version?
Many DAPs are still primarily web-focused. Userpilot supports cross-platform experiences, allowing you to deliver the same onboarding flows across web, iOS, and Android.
Verdict: Choosing the right digital adoption platform
When analyzing Apty competitors, focus on choosing the platform that matches your specific business model and technical environment.
- For internal employee training: Stick with Apty or WalkMe. These tools are well-suited for secure, static environments where you need to enforce compliance while keeping digital transformation initiatives on track.
- For bootstrapped MVPs: Choose UserGuiding to save cash while getting basic functionality.
- For SaaS growth and contextual adoption: Choose Userpilot. If you want to drive revenue, retention, and feature adoption through a flexible, no-code platform that integrates with your tech stack, Userpilot is purpose-built for the job. It combines onboarding and in-app guidance with surveys and AI-supported analytics to allow you collect user data, turn it into actionable insights, and immediately act on what you learn inside the product.
If you are ready to build sophisticated onboarding flows without writing code, get started with Userpilot here or book a demo to see how we can tailor the experience to your SaaS.
Userpilot strives to provide accurate information to help businesses determine the best solution for their particular needs. Due to the dynamic nature of the industry, the features offered by Userpilot and others often change over time. The statements made in this article are accurate to the best of Userpilot’s knowledge as of its publication/most recent update on Feb 4, 2026.
FAQ
What is a digital adoption platform (DAP)?
A DAP is software that helps drive user productivity by providing contextual help as users complete tasks inside digital tools.
Why look for an Apty alternative?
Here are the most common reasons to consider Apty alternatives:
1. You need to onboard customers, not employees
Apty shines when you need to help employees use internal software correctly. But if you are a product manager in a SaaS company, your goals probably revolve around user engagement, not improving internal compliance. Apty lacks the subtle UI patterns and behavioral triggers necessary for a smooth customer journey.
2. The interface feels outdated
Users often cite that Apty’s flow builder is clunky and feels outdated. You may want a visual builder that lets you see exactly what your users will see without navigating a maze of menus.
3. You want actionable data, not just completion rates
Knowing that a user finished a tour is fine. Knowing why they dropped off, or how that tour impacted their retention metrics, is far more useful. Apty provides basic analytics, but it lacks the deep product insights required to make strategic decisions.





